Xargaga

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Xargaga, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Tip of the day...

Linking to a section of an article

Sometimes it is preferable to refer to a section of a page when linking, rather than to the whole page. You can create a link to any subheading on any page in Wikipedia by including a # followed by the subheading at the end of a link.

For example: Wikipedia:Community portal#Help out.

In all section links, be sure to use a piped link for readability.

Using a piped link, the previous example looks like this: Help out.

If a section title changes, rather than going red/inactive, the link will lead to the top of the linked page.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Read more:

Wikipedia:Section#Section linking  

Wikipedia:Anchor

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Thank you. Xargaga (talk) 03:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history at Hargeisa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ciiseciise007 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Ciiseciise007 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You have edited that page 5 times then made a discussion, that goes clearly againts wp rules Ciiseciise007 (talk) 23:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

First three times was to add content and sources. It was my mistake I should done it in one go. In the other two edits I was reverted by you and another user, without giving a sufficient reason why you reverted a sourced edit and in addition to that you did not engage in the talk page. Xargaga (talk) 23:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You were blocked for the same thing just a few days ago as distruptive editing on multiple pages so you cannot pretend you didnt know the rules. It seems you do not abide by wp rules. Ciiseciise007 (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Can you explain why you disagree with the sourced material in the article talk page?Xargaga (talk) 23:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

This isnt the place for such a discussion, use the necessary talk page. Ciiseciise007 (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

That is what I just stated. Use the article talk page to clarify why you dispute the edit. Xargaga (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Somaliland - Clan System". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 6 December 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 05:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Somaliland - Clan System, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)