User talk:X!/archive3
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Toolserveraccount
Hello Soxred93,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to 
. We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. 00:25, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
P.S:Merry Christmas! :)
thank you
There's a lot left to do; New York City Ballet, my great love, has over 400 dances in their rep.
They're in the habit of naming ballets with the title of the music, which certainly adds to the number of redirects.
I'm trying as well to clean up the taxonomy of the dance, and particularly ballet, articles and categories.
Other Wikipedians have noticed that it is -- frankly -- a mess, though not of my making; I'm a newcomer.
I'll be on vacation from January 4th through 24th so there will be three weeks of little Wiki.
Thank you again and seasons greetings! Robert Greer (talk) 19:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I'm glad that you appreciate my barnstar. Soxred93 has a boring sig 20:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- I do. Robert Greer (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
19xx's in Place
The bot seems to be tagging articles like 1830 in Mexico as orphan. I'd think they would be expected to be orphans, from the very nature of the page. DGG (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- So what pages does it need to skip then? Soxred93 has a boring sig 13:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I've asked more questions. I thought you may want to read his answers. The Transhumanist 00:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Vermont ad
Hi, I think your ad is cool, but do you think that you can lighten the background for users who can't see dark on dark? Thanks! miranda 04:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed. Is that better? Soxred93 has a boring sig 05:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
JMuniBot BRFA
Hi red, I didnt archive this because it is possible for it be reopened and so it is not true to say new comments go in a new section ... I will leave it now that it has been done anyway. -- maelgwn - talk 05:21, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
A Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Well done patrolling vandalism today! :) *Cremepuff222* 02:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC) |
*Cremepuff222* 02:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't think you read what you were reverting to - [1] Although the anon was blanking, they were doing so because the article had been thoroughly vandalized and even moved to a meaningless page. :) Corvus cornixtalk 21:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)