User talk:Wysprgr2005/Archives/2010/January

Rollback

Hi, can you please explain to me how this is a legitimate use of rollback? Thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Pohta ce-am pohtit, the user who made the edit to get rid of it, has a suspected sock template on his/her userpage and a line saying to rv all edits of said user immediately. With that, I did. The edit line summary also listed "a doze google books hits" which I thought...was strange to say the least. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 17:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

The template is a joke (read the Cthulu article it links to) and the edit summary refers to the fact that there are a dozen google books hits for Picture Motion Browser. Please be more careful in future. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

LoL, I didn't think anyone would take that template seriously. I'll remove it. Didn't mean to cause trouble. Pcap ping 12:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Picture Motion Browser

Did you create this article from scratch? The first version already had a bunch of tags. Pcap ping 12:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

I did. I couldn't find anything useful that wasn't on a Sony branded site so I added a tag for reliable 3rd party references. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 17:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For keeping me busy over at WP:AIV today. Keep up the good work. Trusilver 20:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Reverting a user warning

Since when is issuing a warning for [1] this sort of edit considered unconstructive? 98.248.32.44 (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, didn't know that was the case. My apologies and I've unwarned you. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 04:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:PlayTV issue

Hello Mr. Wysprgr2005

Apparently you have reverted my last edit at the Talk page of PlayTV article...

I would like to make clear that i decided to erase the talk page because of vandalism, and I made no comments about it because I thought that everyone was able to understand that "A TV Brasília yes Affiliation á Rede TV! Faeldf" it's not constructive info!

I expect you to trully read the log page, and judge the case again...

Sincerely, Victorprosa (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

PS: I am not a newbie here at Wikipedia, I do have a lot of knowledge, because I used to edit without an account...

Alright, I've undid my warning on your talk page. Feel free to edit the page in question again. - Wysprgr2005 (talk) 05:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)