Image copyright problem with Image:NOPDPatch.gif edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:NOPDPatch.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 21:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Atlanta Police Department. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Atlanta Police Department. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 'Vandalism' here consists of (again) removing sourced content (unexplained blanking}, and of introducing decidedly non-neutral edits (POV editing), which, to top it off, were copied and pasted from http://www.atlantaga.gov/Government/Police.aspx (copyright violations). Drmies (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interactive Defense was not created. Please do not recreate this article, as it was composed mainly of copyrighted information. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  05:03, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply