Welcome!

edit

Hello Worshiplife, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Soap 21:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notability

edit

You seem to understand wiki syntax very well so I'm wondering if you could do these things to help your page survive:

Actually we are good at cutting and pasting and used the biographical approach that was outlined by Matt Redman.

  • 1) Could you verify that Let it Rise is one of the top 100 songs used by churches around the world, as claimed in your Holland Davis article?

Yes... it is verifiable through CCLI's top 100 chart.

  • 2) Could you verify that you have appeared on those TV shows and worked with the record labels you mention in the first few paragraphs?

Yes... there is video footage available of the television appearances and there are CD projects, song titles, etc. that contain Holland Davis' name.

  • 3) Could you clarify whether Healing Word was released in 2002 or 2006?

Released 2002 as verified on CDBaby.com/hollanddavis

How do you suggest this is done?


Thank you and I'm sorry if I seem unkind but everyone has to meet the same standards. Soap 21:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this:

  1. You may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization.
  2. Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guideline to avoid editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. BelovedFreak 22:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Worshiplife, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Holland Davis

edit
 

The article Holland Davis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG . All of the sources are self-published and I see no source to support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Holland Davis for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holland Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holland Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:57, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply