Wormeatingforbears

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viscount Waverley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 16:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarbieHencock. You may also wish to read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending_yourself_against_claims. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 21:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at John Anderson, 3rd Viscount Waverley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What you're doing on that article--unreferenced slander, basically--is not acceptable. Your edits have been reverted a few times; re-inserting that unacceptable material is a blockable offense. Drmies (talk) 21:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Your editing privileges have been indefinitely suspended

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)