Dear Roger What is this "fora" word yoiu used on one of the comment pages. Wikipedia is liberal with undefined words!
Tell me more about this Blue Yonder - how do I join?
If you like I have a much shorter version - that ONLY really is a list of references that describe the development of the theory over the last 10,000 years.
If you believe that Wikipedia is BOUND to call any such article "Original Research" (presumably the reading of the references is that!) would you please say a few words on that topic and how other authors have quoted references.
Many thanks Will Geist (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- According to this on Wiktionary fora or forums are both acceptable plurals of forum.
- Possibly it is your "copy editor" who is on BlueYonder. These edits were done by someone using a cable modem from somewhere in the Dalston area. The person paying for this internet access (which is provided by Telewest now merged into Virgin Media) is entitled to a free website - just as I have RHaworth.myBY.co.uk.
- Yes, I am sorry, but I think it is bound to be dismissed as original research. WP:SYNTH applies more strongly with every new ref you add. To see refs applied "properly", look at acculturation for example. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)