This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, WhiteBOT I, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:13, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

WhiteBOT I (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Accept reason:

On the assumption that this username is not related to Lincelot Marketing, I am allowing a username change to the requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 22:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "El Alfa"

edit
 

A page you created, El Alfa, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 20:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Reblocked - still editing under this name, no request for name change was entered. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:51, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhiteBOT I (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

unlock me please I' cree on artcle of El Alfa was deleted

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but that's unintelligible. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WhiteBOT I (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

no answer given to questions after reasonable waiting time.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • I have restored the block notices and unblock templates you removed, WhiteBOT. Please note that you are not permitted to remove notices regarding an active block from your talk page. This includes block rationales and previous unblock requests. If you continue to blank block-related noticed, your ability to edit this talk page may be removed. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
You were previously unblocked to allow to request a change of username, yet you continued editing without making any such request. I assume that you did not understand the instructions. Before being unblocked again, can you please briefly describe what steps you will take to request a username change? (Hint: see WP:CHU). Yunshui  08:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Also, it is evident that you are the same person who previously edited under the username User talk:BlackBOT III. You had already, before you created this account, had it explained that a username with "bot" was unacceptable, been blocked, been unblocked to allow a username change, edited again under the old username, and been blocked again. To then go through exactly the same process again with a new account casts some doubt on whether you actually intend to cooperate. If you don't, then Wikipedia is not the place for you. I strongly suggest that. If you are serious about wishing to be unblocked, you answer these concerns, as well as answering Yunshui's message above. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Is it possible there's a language barrier here? Pretty much every resident in a country that doesn't have a large Wikipedia/Wikimedia presence assumes by default the English Wikipedia is the only one. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:37, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply