Request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeGotThatBeduguhuc (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not even know who that is ??? that account hasn't been on for ages why are you bringing this up now, they were also extremely rude and insulted people, i would never do that, and they only edited one article

Decline reason:

  Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeGotThatBeduguhuc (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know I did sockpuppetry, but when the ban happened I had already moved on, I was a different Person on TimeToMakeAStand, I completely shifted my policy of mindless editing, with consensus building, and I only sought to go after and report the worst and most stubborn offenders, I made a mistake by pledging to continue making new accounts, when I should have just asked for TimeToMakeAStand to be blocked and this account unblocked, There was also not much of a great deal of overlap, I haven't really been thinking straight and I know I haven't really made the best attempt to get unbanned in a reasonable way, but I stand here now hoping to recover from my past mistakes, and once again be a productive user on Wikipedia. I have grown very attached to this account, and it's username, so if this appeal doesn't work, I will not make another account WeGotThatBeduguhuc (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Alright, I think we're done here. You admitted to socking and to lying, and you say you want to "once again be a productive user"; problem is I haven't seen anything productive. So please refer to WP:OFFER, and try this again in six months. Drmies (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Drmies: Thank you, If you need an example of me being productive, please look at these edits. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1023220856 , https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1022886365 , both done before this account was banned, I just didn't log in that time, and bear in mind I haven't really been on Wikipedia for long, I also have contributed similar content to other wikis. WeGotThatBeduguhuc (talk) 04:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Particularly when that declined unblock request shows you were flat-out lying. --Yamla (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

I was not attempting to hide the previous unblock request, I knew it would already show up in the logs of the wikipedia appeals (if such a thing exists) but I acknowledge everything I have ever done and I am willing to be fully transparent abouteverything. but to be fair the wikipedia admins probably already know everything. I am just asking to turn over a new leaf since the events of getting banned seemed to have come out of nowhere after I had moved on to actually being relatively serious about what I was doing based on a dispute, I suspect people were behind it, which sent me down the path of vowing to never give in and always come back, but everything I have done then has been very inoffensive, and to this day I regret not simply asking for TimeToMakeAStand to get banned instead of WeGotThatBeduguhuc, I always found it odd how they decided to ban the account I was actively using and keep the one I had abandoned fully, as I don't want to be the person I was on that account anymore. and have not been that person since then. WeGotThatBeduguhuc (talk) 00:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeGotThatBeduguhuc (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know I did sockpuppetry, but when the ban happened I had already moved on, I was a different Person on TimeToMakeAStand, I completely shifted my policy of mindless editing, with consensus building, and I only sought to go after and report the worst and most stubborn offenders, I made a mistake by pledging to continue making new accounts, when I should have just asked for TimeToMakeAStand to be blocked and this account unblocked, There was also not much of a great deal of overlap, I haven't really been thinking straight and I know I haven't really made the best attempt to get unbanned in a reasonable way, but I stand here now hoping to recover from my past mistakes, and once again be a productive user on Wikipedia. I have grown very attached to this account, and it's username, so if this appeal doesn't work, I will not make another account. I did think the decision to ban this account and not TimeToMakeAStand (the account I barely used) was odd though and I probably wouldn't have gone down that path if that account was banned instead of this one.

I am sending this again because someone in the last response said I had not done anything productive, which is not true as these edits (on my old ip) show otherwise, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1023220856

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dark_(TV_series)&diff=prev&oldid=1022886365

and this other edit on another website where I added an new courses section which was quite challenging to put together, which remains on that page, to this day https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_Kart_8_Deluxe&diff=3056135&oldid=3055831 https://www.mariowiki.com/Mario_Kart_8_Deluxe (the current article) proof that account is me, i had to edit a random article because i can't create my own user page there https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Mario_Artist:_Paint_Studio&diff=3231493&oldid=3088352

Please review this and decide whether it makes any difference to the appeal

WeGotThatBeduguhuc (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Your only possible pathway back to editing is to observe the standard offer process, as you were previously advised. You may come back in January to request unblock again. 331dot (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I acknowledge everything edit

and I will not deny anything WeGotThatBeduguhuc (talk) 16:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply