Raw Material (Uprok)(album)

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Raw Material (Uprok)(album), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Raw Material. (album). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Rawmaterial-uprock.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Rawmaterial-uprock.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rawmaterial-uprock.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Rawmaterial-uprock.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of DJ Dust

edit
 

A tag has been placed on DJ Dust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Noah 07:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

DJ Dust image

edit

In regards the speedy deletion for the image for DJ Dust on the article -- the photo is a promotional one, and has been used before in promoting the group Mars ILL. It's currently being used on other articles, so I'm not sure why it would be singled out here on DJ Dust's article.Wardomatic (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

While I'm happy to answer questions, it looks like your question could have been answered and resolved more quickly if you had used my message wizard. It's linked as "Talk" after my name and at the top of my talk page. Why not try it next time?
Please add messages to the bottom of my page, not the top.
The image File:Manchildrapper.jpg has been tagged as replaceable. This tagging applies to all uses of the image. This is because the image is of a living person, and non-free images of living people are not generally permitted on Wikipedia. Stifle (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply