Welcome!

Hello, W.E.Ward.III, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  ElinorD (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your signature

edit

Can you please type four tildes like this ~~~~ at the end of your posts on discussion pages, or else use the signature button which appears in the list of tools just above the edit box while you're typing your post (tenth button from the left)? They convert automatically into your username, with a link to your user page, plus the date and time of the post. Three tildes would just give your linked username, while five would just give the date and time. At the moment, it seems as if you're typing Bill Ward manually, with no link (and in any case, your user name is W.E.Ward.III, not Bill Ward), and then typing five tildes to give the date and time. Your posts on talk pages should all link to your user page, so that people can get easily to your talk page if they want to leave a message for you. Thanks. ElinorD (talk) 16:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi ElinorD. That would be an incorrect thought; I'm typing four tildes and getting Bill Ward. Just like this Bill Ward 17:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC) However, I had RAW Signature checked; I'll uncheck that, and it should work. I was curious as to why it wasn't putting a hyperlink to my signature. Bill Ward 17:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Anglican collaboration of the month

edit

Wassupwestcoast 03:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

edit

Hello! I noticed that you have been a contributor to articles on Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. You may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - |WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand Anglican-related articles! Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 03:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Thank you for your encouragement! I'm now (somewhat wearily) making my way through my watchlist. fishhead64 (talk) 20:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back! You were missed. Bill Ward (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Apostolic Succession edits

edit

Hi Bill:

Thanks for your feedback on my apostolic succession contribs. I've been plugging away in a rather piecemeal fashion on it. I re-worded it in accordance with your suggestions and moved it higher in the article under the "Protestant Response" section. I've tried to synthesize trends I've observed in Protestant polemics as a result of Protestant/Eastern Orthodox dialog and competition that put the doctrine of apostolic succession in a different light than it's been cast in previous Roman Catholic-Protestant debates. Hopefully, I've got enough source citations and wikified words that the section doesn't seem like "Original Research." --ManicBrit (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Holy Apostles Anglican/Roman Catholic Church

edit

I just googled your parish and, wow, talk about notable! Why is there no article for it here at wiki? -- Secisek (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Herman Hollerith

edit

Please stop inserting that blurb about Hollerith's great-grandson in his article. The family section of a biography article is supposed to be about the subject of the article. In general it should stick to relatives he knew and interacted with, or ancestors who had some influence on his upbringing. It should not be a laundry list of people who happen to be able to place him on their genealogical charts. The article is about the life and works of Herman Hollerith, after all.

If Bishop Hollerith is notable, and I think the case can be made, please feel free to write an article about him. Odds are that, given they have the same first and last names, a Hollerith disambiguation page would follow that would lead to his article. Rklear (talk) 00:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I concur. A new article on the bishop can be created. - Astrochemist (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wish to comment?

edit

As one who watched the discussion but was not allowed to intervene, you may wish to comment here. Lima (talk) 15:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

info

edit

I notice your interest in the article which is now called "Catholic Church". This subject is presently under discussion at arbitration if you are interested.[1] - I myself only found out because somebody was kind enough to tip me off. Taam (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ichthus: January 2012

edit
 

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion

edit

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 19:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply