Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:UzAutoSanoat

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:UzAutoSanoat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:28, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page.

Deb (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Voobrajen (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I firmly disclose financial compensation from any organisation.I have already realized my guilt (advertising and promotion) and this will never happen again as I am intented to be a part of wikipedia for a long time. From now on, I will be accurate and follow the wikipedia's instructions and policies, doing my best to improve information and translations in universe of wikipedia.

Decline reason:

No such disclosure was made. You also haven't convinced me you have read, let alone understood, WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Voobrajen (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The thing is that I am not paid by any organization or have relations with any company. In fact, I am a student of International University (I can prove it by providing personal information if you need) who wished and was asked by a professor to describe automotive undustry of a country as there is no suitable information about it. The reasons of blocking are: improper username, uncertainty about neutrality of a writer and lack of experience. In details, the article lacks in reliable sources and is not written by a neutral person (in your opinion) needs to be encyclopedic based only on facts. I tried to be brief to save your time, but it doesn't mean that I had not understood; I know my faults, but please give me an opportunity to prove it. Regards.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as unresponsive. You are welcome to make a new request when you are able to engage with us and respond to Rosguill below. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Can you clarify what kinds of articles you intend to edit if unblocked? signed, Rosguill talk 18:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

globally renamed Kduztrade to Voobrajen

edit

globally renamed Kduztrade to Voobrajen --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply