Vmash

Speedy deletion nomination of Vugar Ismailov

Hello Vmash,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vugar Ismailov for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Nsk92 (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Question

Nsk92 (talk), your answer on your talk page is against the principles of Wikipedia:Equality. You write that only User:AynuraJafarova (while logged in as User:AynuraJafarova ) can place a request at WP:DRV to have the Vugar Ismailov re-created. It leaves me no choice, except going to another person for help. I find it totally unfair. You write that if the arguments about editorships of journals had been brought up in the AfD at the proper time, it is quite possible that the article might have been kept. To your notice: These arguments were brought up in the discussion and you asked a question, but then the arguments and your question were immediately removed from discussion (look at the history of discussions here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vugar_Ismailov&oldid=739682967 and after deletion here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vugar_Ismailov&oldid=739707050. So, my question is how can I re-create the article without turning to User:AynuraJafarova for help? And how can I prove that my account is not a sock puppet of User:AynuraJafarova? Vmash (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments to Nsk92

Nsk92 (talk), I have just seen that you went to TomStar81 (talk) for protection of the page at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=739847040#Vugar_Ismailov. So only administrators can create it. Thus your answer on your talk page is void, since the only way to re-create the article is to become an administrator :-) Vmash (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

No, it is not. If a re-creation request is filed at WP:DRV and approved there, then a request for unprotection would have to be filed at WP:RPP. After that the article can then be re-created in mainspace without being an admin. In fact a request for unprotection can be filed at WP:RPP at any time, but it is unlikely to be approved until there is a positive decision at WP:DRV, or if there is evidence of continuing WP:SOCK activity. Nsk92 (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Nsk92 (talk), can I place a request at WP:DRV or necessarily should find and ask User:AynuraJafarova to do it? Anyhow, it seems that I will not be able to make a re-creation request since my account was blocked indefinitely. :-( Vmash (talk) 18:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

You answered your own question. Nsk92 (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Nsk92 (talk), I prefer to become an administrator to create the article rather than go to someone, whom I do not know. Vmash (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Nsk92 (talk), I have just checked that the account of User:AynuraJafarova was blocked indefinitely https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AynuraJafarova. So, I was right, your answer on your talk page was void and the only way to re-create the article is to become an administrator. Vmash (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

No it is not. The template posted at the webpage of User:AynuraJafarova is incorrect. If you look at the actual block log [1], you will see that the block is for two weeks, and not indefinite. Nsk92 (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Nsk92 (talk), thank you for your answer. As I wrote above the arguments about editorships of journals were brought up in the AfD. Why all sock puppet comments were kept at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vugar_Ismailov, but only these comments were removed? Were they considered most disruptive among other sock puppet comments? Vmash (talk) 05:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I am assuming you are referring to this edit[2] and it's removal[3]. At the point in the AfD where this happened it would not have mattered anyway. Edits/comments/votes by socks are either reverted immediately, or crossed out, or collapsed/hatted (that's up to best judgement of the person doing it and depends on the circumstances, e.g. on how many edits made by non-socks would be reverted in the process as well) , but they are never given any weight or taken into account by the admin closing an AfD in any case. Nsk92 (talk) 09:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vmash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked indefinitely several days ago. At the same time I am willing to make some important contributions. So, if possible, unblock my account. Vmash (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is that you are believed to be a sockpuppet of AynuraJafarova (talk · contribs). Yamla (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.