Vladar86

Fair use rationale for Image:Sakupljac.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sakupljac.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 11:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

List of Serbian films

Hi -pleasantly surprised at the level of development on this - you've made my task a lot easier -great work. Can I interest you in developing the List of Yugoslavian films? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 17:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes. It may include croatian/slovenian films etc as well as Serbian but I am fully aware that Yugoslavia as a country produced many films every year which at present the lists don't reflect. Once they devlope we may have to split them by decade e.g Yugoslavian films of the 1950s or even by year like Italian films of 1950 etc. Eventually we'll get all of the films onto wikipedia with good articles on them. I don't know if you know but imdb has an index of the Yugoslavian films by year. Would you find this useful? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 19:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Here is the Yugloslavian film index. I don't know if all the films are notable but I'm sure you know which ones are or not. Also as you can see the 1980s and 1990s haven't been put in the proper table format yet and I think there is too much in some of the last columns which bloats it too much. If you could devlope this this would be extremely useful. Best regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 20:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah I see. I'm sure you can find a lot of titles to add though. Yes it has become increasingly aware to me how flawed imdb is - Azerbaijan has a huge cinema industry yet imdb only shows it as having three or four films!!! A good way to look may be to search by language etc. I'm certain you can find a lot of missing titles which should have articles. All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^Talk? 20:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

JosipMac

I agree with you over JosipMac. I know you didn't edit the orthodox churches. He is just blaming you because you have personal anti Kosovo views. But it is ok as i am siding with you over that debate with JosipMac as i have personal pro Kosovo views. I know that me and you on that article both have a NPOV when editing because i have checked the history and i would have seen if you had edited the orthodox church, but you didn't. If JosipMac accuses you again in the future of doing something that you have not done, let me know because i will back you up. What he is doing is unfair. Ijanderson977 (talk) 22:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:25, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Move to Kosovska Kamenica

Please, get involved!

Talk:Kamenica_(Kosovo)#Requested_move

Best regards, Pagliaccioknows (talk) 16:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Vladar86! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Branislav Ciga Jerinić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Vladan Dujović - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Dragomir Čumić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Dubravko Jovanović - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Slobodan Ninković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Neda Arnerić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Vladan Dujović

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Vladan Dujović requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. -- WORMMЯOW  13:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Branislav Ciga Jerinić

The article Branislav Ciga Jerinić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not assert notability and is an unreferenced biography of a living person (WP:BLP).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kubanczyk (talk) 14:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)