Vilnisr

Welcome!

graph stargate

good job on the graph :) question how did u make it Digmores (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2010 (UTC) Digmores (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

thanks and good question, why you ask Vilnisr (talk) 13:31, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Show by date

Hello, Vilnisr. You have new messages at Jimp's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding {{show by date}}, not sure when I'll get to work on adding another parameter. But in the meantime you should be able to get the effect by "nesting" the template, to show a particular text for only one date (or perhaps for only a range of dates):

{{show by date|2010|04|25|Today is before 25 April 2010|{{show by date|2010|04|26|Today is exactly 25 April 2010|Today is after 25 April 2010}}}}

results in

Today is after 25 April 2010

The trick is to start with an instance of the target date, then in the "after" parameter, use another {{show by date}} to select between the target date and the after date. However, concur that an exact-date parameter would be a good extension, but in a way which doesn't disrupt the existing parameter order (might have to be a named parameter such as "showondate="). Hope this helps. Dl2000 (talk) 20:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hey you edited (or at the very least joined) my stargate wiki. Just letting you know, if you didn't that it moved to an independent server http://stargate-wiki.org/ and i was wondering if you wanted to join and edit. I could use more new users to help drive up edits and to shove in teh face of vandals. Let me know (as account creation on the wiki is disabled for now) - Escyos — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.203.223.101 (talk) 03:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes, i could do that! Vilnisr ^{T | C} 08:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

= Star Trek moves

I have reverted all your changes to Star Trek: First Contact and Star Trek: Insurrection. Unlike Generations, these two films were marketed with the colon, and so moving them would be improper; secondly, cut-and-paste moves are prohibited due to Wikipedia's content licensing policies; see WP:MOVE for instructions on how to properly do one in the future. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Not historically; the StarTrek.com shorthand isn't even used in the majority of its uses (http://www.startrek.com/database_article/star-trek-first-contact). Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Show by date solution

Vilnisr, I saw your post at User talk:AnomieBOT. I'm unaware how Anomie handles stale threads, so I'm posting directly here. You can use this code instead of {{Show by date}}, which solves your problem:

{{#switch:{{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}
|25 June | 26 June = Stuff to display on 25 and 26 June
|29 June = Stuff to display on 29 and 30 June
|11 September = Stuff to display on 11 September
|#default = any other date. For your purpose, leave this blank
}}

Cheers, — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 06:58, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

This one is easier to use :) but in other way i don't see a difference, if i will use this template, it also will get "expired", they both are "show and hide" templates – Vilnisr ^{T | C} 07:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

October 2019

Stargate

Why do you say my edit is incorrect? (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stargate&oldid=prev&diff=921024702) The stylization of the word Stargate has the A looking like a lambda with a ring above. It's visible in the graphic on the same page. My edit adds the ring to the lambda. Your edit removes it. Can you elaborate on why you think the ring should be removed? Hixie (talk) 03:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

I know about stargate stilization and you are right about "lambda with a ring above", but it is impossible to do it here without replacing letter with an image. It puts ring far away from lambda so it looks incorrect. I will not revert edit, but its my opinion.– Vilnisr ^{T | C} 04:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

Vilnisr, this would have very quickly explained your recent edits to Stargate Atlantis. Thanks. — Manticore 21:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)