Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Viktor Sublime, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! 122.52.19.15 (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of dog crossbreeds, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:BREED for this article and for the other dog articles you changed. Wikipedia has its own style guide. It does not matter what other style guides recommend. Meters (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please take notice of the polite message above. Continuing to edit against consensus after being asked not to is not a great idea, and can have undesirable consequences. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
And please read WP:MINOR. Many of your edits are not minor, particularly when you have already been informed that they are breaking MOS. Meters (talk) 18:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit
Hi Ad Orientem,
I'm a long time user, but new to editing. Sorry for rubbing you guys the wrong way on the dog breeds. I didn't see your messages--I wasn't checking messages and they didn't catch my attention. I'll try to be more aware. I think I offered some indisputable improvements in the the syntax and grammar, but I guess making the breeds lower case was a big job that needed some sort of green light from an admin. I do want to point out that dog breeds are lower case, and students and young people who in particular who are using the site for information should know that. All my edits were double checked against Merriam Webster and MLA, which I mentioned. Also, the few times I added to the general intro, it was because there was a note requesting it in the section, and I did change every single sentence and cited at the end, but I understand the requirement for even more novelty from the source. I did not go back and change a single edit of mine that was undone by someone else, so I was not warring. I just kept moving through the breeds and never saw your messages. Anyway, I love dogs, but will leave the dog breeds alone. I think your block was fair because it caught my attention when your messages did not, and it expires in 48 hours. Thanks for helping to keep the quality up and I hope to keep playing in your sandbox. --Viktor Viktor Sublime (talk) 04:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Yes, the dog breed capitalization issue was problematic. Thanks for taking this onboard as a learning experience. Happy editing. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cullen328 (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Hello Viktor Sublime! Your additions to American Leopard Hound have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. You cannot simply copy text form a source and change just a few words. That is overly close paraphrasing Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 12:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you resume this pattern if disruptive behavior when your block expires, your next one is going to be indefinite. This should be understood as a FINAL WARNING. -Ad Orientem (talk) 12:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply