Welcome!

Hello, Venkatesh41087, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ooranayakanvalasu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pmlineditor  15:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ooranayakanvalasu edit

 

The article Ooranayakanvalasu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not really notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pmlineditor  15:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've contested the proposed deletion, as villages are often presumed to be notable. However, I am unable to verify whether it exists based on the information provided in the article, so it may still be listed at Articles for deletion. References would be useful, and I've made some other suggestions for improvements to the article on Talk:Ooranayakanvalasu. snigbrook (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ooranayakanvalasu edit

 

The article Ooranayakanvalasu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All Google results are Wikipedia mirrors, probably a hoax.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk to me 21:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ooranayakanvalasu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ooranayakanvalasu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ooranayakanvalasu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Everymorning talk to me 21:31, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply