Ved havet

Welcome!

Hi Ved havet! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Jerm (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Mexico City Grand Prix and badminton

Hello. If you have got the wrong idea about what my point was, or the position I was taking at Talk:2021 Formula One World Championship, it's probably my fault for not handling the whole thing better.

This all started a couple days ago when I noticed this edit to Template:Formula One Grands Prix. I innocently clicked on the newly-added link to Mexico City Grand Prix, and was absolutely astonished to find myself taken to an article about a badminton tournament. (up until a few hours ago, Mexico City Grand Prix was the name of a badminton article; it was a direct link not a redirect) After a rather lengthy discussion at the editor's talk page, I noticed the same editor had made several other edits of similar nature, linking the badminton article in several Formula One related pages. I reverted them all.

Then after that, I see the piped links thread at Talk:2021 Formula One World Championship and realized the thread, in part at least, was the motivation behind the edits I had just reverted. My fear was that others would soon do the same thing without realizing the situation. So I looked into moving Mexico City Grand Prix to a redirect to Mexican Grand Prix. I found this was technically impossible, without the help of an admin. I also noticed the talk page had a banner for a previous requested move in February. That move is what brought the badminton article to be named Mexico City Grand Prix in the first place. My fears grew because I thought, not only are people going to be trying to link this badminton article in F1 articles, but it's also going take a little while to get the mess straightened out and get the page moved to where it should be. (It was here I made several incorrect assumptions about what it would take to fix the problem.)

So anyway I go to Talk:2021 Formula One World Championship and write the "Leningrad example", the post you first replied. Now, what I should have done instead, was simply state to everyone, "hey all, you may or may not already know this, but Mexico City Grand Prix currently links to a badminton tournament, fyi". Why I didn't just do that, I don't know. Maybe it was late, I was tired, had a few drinks, etc. I can say that I didn't want to call out the editor, who in good faith, made the link changes earlier; especially after I had already talked to the editor at length on his talk page.

So none of what you replied to really had anything to do with my position on piped links vs redirects. It had nothing to with São Paulo. You and anyone else may change as many links to redirects as you like as long as its gonna help. It's a damn good idea! But that's not what I was getting at...

It was all about Mexico City Grand Prix and badminton. DB1729 (talk) 15:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

I see, apologize for the misunderstanding! With the badminton page having been moved I suppose the situation is resolved. Ved havet (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

External link and wikilink syntax

Just for your information, you can format external links like so: [https://example.org], which gives [1]. Alternatively, you can do [https://example.org this], which becomes this. The piping is only for wikilinks; the previous one is [[WP:PIPE|piping]]. If you combine pipes with external links, the link will break: [https://example.org|this] creates this unintentional behavior [2]. Hope you found that helpful. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Kevin O'Connell

Sorry about reverting the wrong edit.

Regards, AbelAndCain AbelAndCain (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

@AbelAndCain: No worries at all, the edit history is a mess at the moment! Ved havet ≈ (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

missed ping

Hey Ved havet, just letting you know that your attempted ping at talk:Melissa Lucio was not sent, because you modified an earlier comment rather than making a new one. See WP:MENTION: basically you need to get it right the first time or make a new paragraph with a new signature. (It kind of sucks.)

Anyway, I have that particular page on my watchlist, so no need to ping me there in the future.

I will not reply now; I'm still thinking about it and I want to see if CB replies first. Kind regards from PJvanMill)talk( 22:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

I was under the impression that replacing my signature with a new one in the same edit would trigger a ping. Oh well! Ved havet ≈ (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)