EOL edit

Hi, do you understand what is going on with EOL and Geum? Are you perhaps a knowledgeable editor of EOL? Is it prone to glitches? The link that you now have there looks fine, and doesn't include an entry for Geum avens, but the previous one that you had there was for Geum avens itself, and had images from the wrong genus. I'm interested because at one time I considered editing EOL, but it seemed more productive to spend my time on wikipedia. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks, that fixed the previous link. I adding links to EOL, GRIN, IPNI and etc. on the AzWiki and RuWiki to the templates. At the same time to incorporate them into EnViki. Best regards Vago (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

li:User:Vagobot edit

Could you get a bot flag please? For more information, read the first lines concerning bots here. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done.Vago (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Bot status on dv.wikipedia edit

Hi,

You are making bot edits on dv.wikipedia. Can you please get a blot flag there? Thank you. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. edit

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. Could you follow the Kars article and prevent the constant nationalist POV reversals and editions of User:MarshallBagramyan. Thank you.

Your bot @zea.wiki edit

Could you please make a request for a bot flag here? Thank you :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ok! :) Best regards, Vago (talk) 10:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article. edit

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

English bot bad edit case edit

Could you please have your bot watch out for blanked pages, and not add stuff to the blanked pages. Here is the specific edit that caught my eye. The bot's edit is worthless on the empty vandalized page, and makes it more difficult to undo the blanking vandalism. - TexasAndroid (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC) thisReply

The bot automatically inserts interwiki. Therefore it is necessary from an article in the Japanese Wikipedia remove the interwiki. Then the robot will not added interwiki again. Best regards, Vago (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your bot on English Wikipedia edit

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 11:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your bot on Ladino Wikipedia edit

We are looking to clean up inactive bots on Judeo-Spanish (Ladino) Wikipedia. Your bot lad:User:Vagobot has been inactive for over three years. Consistent with the proposed bot policy of this wiki, we will remove the bot permission from your bot account unless you respond within one week at this page. Thank you for your prompt attention. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Vago. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requesting small help edit

Hello many greetings,

Requesting your proactive contribution and support in updating Draft:Aurats (word) in relation to the languages you know well.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 04:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Translation request edit

Hello Vago, Would you write / translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the Azərbaycanca Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 14:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply