Welcome!

edit
 
This user is a Registered Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Hello, Ubivxoq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.

Again, welcome! C F A 💬 04:27, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the warm welcome! I am happy to contribute to making Wikipedia a reliable source of knowledge! Ubivxoq (talk) 04:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

National varieties of English

edit

  Hello. In a recent edit to the page St John's Wood, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for this reminder and advice. Appreciate it. Ubivxoq (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Ubivxoq! Your additions to Cornelia Funke have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:15, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Appreciate your feedback and tips. Am a beginner editor so I still have much to learn. Will definitely keep all your reminders and shared guidelines in mind, so I can edit while adhering to community standards. Thank you very much. Ubivxoq (talk) 06:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your recent edit on Vanessa Greene was also a copyright violation. Please do not copy content from an external source into Wikipedia again. Thanks, C F A 💬 19:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I just found two more violations on Val Wood and Katie Flynn. If you keep adding copyright content to articles, you may be blocked from editing. I don't mean to be harsh — Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. C F A 💬 19:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ubivxoq - copyright violations. Thank you. C F A 💬 19:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello again. Am sorry about my errors. I have read the guidelines shared with me, but it seems I have overlooked some things which led to my errors. I will review all the necessary copyright guidelines before editing further. I appreciate your feedback, and I will do my best to avoid such copyright errors again. Thank you. Ubivxoq (talk) 07:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monastery of San Vicente de Oviedo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Catholic Library Association

edit

Your recent edit to this page inserted information that should go under the Awards section. Revise. Kmccook (talk) 18:55, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

ok thanks Ubivxoq (talk) 03:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Your edit to Kodansha has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

ok thank you. Apologies for that. I rephrased the introductory part, but the list of awards was enumerated the same order. Perhaps I should have re-arranged them. Ubivxoq (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Regardless of the copyright issue, copying a list of awards from the corporate website is not a good idea, because they can publish whatever they want on there. It's much preferred to find an independent source for each award, a source that can be used to verify that the award was actually bestowed. — Diannaa (talk) 13:36, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply