Fixing up what appears to be unsourced original research

edit

I appreciate that you wrote a longer and, it appears, more richly informative description of Reverend Ike. But this is all unsourced. It seems it might be what Wikipedia calls Wikipedia:Original Research. I suggest that you read the section on Wikipedia:verifiability, and avail yourself of other Wikipedia help resources, and fix up the article. Further discussion should be on the Talk:Reverend Ike talk page for the article. It has been over a week since I pinged you from the talk page, if you don't respond and start working on the issues I might revert the article to the former version. M.boli (talk) 05:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to José García Villa, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

 
The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

(The above message regards some broken formatting in your recent edit, which I've fixed.) In addition, it would be ideal if you would actually post the source of the quote, rather than just mentioning Cowen's name in passing. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply