User talk:Twotwofourtysix/Archives/2021/November

== Sandbox transclusion ==renter’s fraud bill exchange DCGOV1 Terrorism voided certificates 3325 Eagle Nest Point Los Angeles County Healthcare Shoplifting names death’s shoes phones SSAFraud IRS Washington DCGOV1 Terrorism transportation TravelStateGov Mymoneygov911 TM identity Theif Dmvgovca1 Viriginia Abusive State Employments Retirement Welfare Public Trust Highjacked Marketing Technology California’s pd. Herbig Dmvgovca1 Cypress Ca Escape Explorer Monterey. Treasury Secretary State Gov Fraud Virigina Beaches TVs Radio Entertainment Employees Theif Allied Vandalism Moving. FHA. Hotels Motels 1989 flights Unautited by Bose ps magazines Advertising. Mymoneygov911 forgery treasury bonds 1911 Emergency fraud Vehicles theft Property’s Mail Fraud . Employees Ford Motor Carriers Family Businesses denied Internet Licenses Abuse Dmvorg abuse charges employees. TravelStateGov used Internet Forgery statements. Cashier. Richmond Virginia your phone bill exchange DCGOV1 Terrorism electronic payment election’s Networks Scan phones Highjacked Inventory. Conspiracy Charges Gunshots Weapons. Murders Rape Police. 123 Congress President Mayor Secretary State Murders transportation Military marketing . Liberty theft Auto Jeep.

Wikipedia:Sandbox often has serious policy violations including illegal content. I don't think transclusion at User:Twotwofourtysix/sandbox#Sandbox monitor™ is a good idea. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, you're probably right. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 22:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

second.wiki and G12

Good day. I noticed that RouteNote was deleted for reasons including G12 which the example of https://second.wiki/wiki/routenote was given (see User_talk:UnknownEditor1234567890.) I'm not interested in RouteNote, I am curious about how copying from second.wiki can be a copyright violation given that second.wiki content is under CC-BY-SA and also everything in the second.wiki RouteNote page appears to be a translation of the Spanish WP article. Can you please explain how copying from second.wiki is a copyright violation? Thank you Jamplevia (talk) 20:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

I can't remember much from the deleted article back then, but this is probably a mistake on my end. I use https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ to detect copyright violations in articles, and it probably flagged it, even though it should probably be in the excluded URL list over there. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 22:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

I am eligible to be on wikipedia

You said its discouraged to make an article about myself. I am famous so I am eligible to be on wikipedia--Ahhna (talk) 07:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please see then WP:Articles for creation for guidance on making a proper article. Also see the notability guidelines on Wikipedia, specifically the one on biographies. Most autobiographies here that people wanted to created eventually get deleted, mostly because they have a promotional tone, so make sure your article doesn't. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 07:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

This appears to be about Ahhna Shrivstava, which was so bad it had to be hidden.   — Jeff G. ツ 07:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Joseph Kallarangatt: Your request for Reliable Source

In fact here is a contradiction. Your demand for x to Y is impossible since the x is fabricated. So the x should be deleted. Let me show the contradictions. The article in the second paragraph claims about sexual assault and corruption allegation based on footnotes 7,8 and 9. The corruption allegation is based on the article "The right turn by a section of Kerala’s Catholic church is sheer opportunism". A single statement is made by Indulekha Joseph that "There are many allegations the church faces currently, including corruption and sexual offences”. How does this single quote be included in the BLP of Joseph Kallarangatt against him? There is no mention that there is corruption allegation against Joseph Kallarangatt, Please refer the footnote no. 7 https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/right-turn-section-kerala-s-catholic-church-sheer-opportunism-155406

About sexual assault the contradiction is as follows: the term sexual assault is used in paragraph 2 of the article gives the impression that Joseph Kallarangatt has done the assault. Again the matter is referred under the title "2018–2021: Controversies in the Church". Here it is claimed that Joseph Kallarangatt has approached by the nun based on footnote 13 https://caravanmagazine.in/gender-sexuality/bishop-franco-mulakkal-kerala-nun-rape-case-protests But the very footnote 14 which is from The Hindu, a leading newspaper in India, takes a different report. It claims that bishop said that the nun had made verbal reference about the complaint, not any written complaint. It never says that the bishop delayed anything or covered up anything. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/nun-complained-to-me-pala-bishop/article24422306.ece

The title "2018–2021: Controversies in the Church" itself is inappropriate in the write-up about Joseph Kallarangatt since he has nothing to do with the controversies itself that it should be in his BLP. The BLP should contain events that require direct involvement of the person. There is purposeful attempt to defame the person. Sheer vandalism is detected. Whenever a positive information is added just by adding a name about his alma mater, it is deleted instantly. He is a prolific writer, and it is mentioned in the article. When the names of the books are added, it is deleted instantly.

Ezhuth (talk) 10:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ezhuth: What I meant as having to state a change from X to Y doesn't necessarily mean that X has to be replaced with something else. It just means that the stated change that is wanted to be made should be written clearly; in this case, you should state what text you want to be removed in what part of the article, etc, as clearly as possible using reliable sources. You really don't have to create a 3-paragraph essay in my talk page because you really want a text to be removed; this is about whether the request is valid, not whether the edit should be implemented.

TL;DR If you want to discuss this change, discuss it in the article's talk page, not this one, because I'm not interested in it. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 10:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Alternatively, you can use the BLP noticeboard if you think a serious BLP violation has been breached. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 10:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Placeholder

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20211116/114227/HHRG-117-JU00-Wstate-SpottiswoodeT-20211116.pdf

This is Tatiana’s official minutes from her speech in the Congress on Congresses website, word by word what she said just in text form.

Please refer to the first para of p.2 to see Tatiana’s claim that Zia grabbed her butt infront of coworkers.

Please refer to the third para of p.2 (where Tatiana claims Zia called her a bitch).

Alright, noted. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 08:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Tagging page for deletion

Hello, Twotwofourtysix,

Thanks for tagging Talk:Aashish Jung, I don't know how you spotted it. However, any time you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you need to post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. I saw you used Twinkle, which is great, so please check your Twinkle Preferences and make sure "Notify page creator" box is checked. Also, every CSD criteria should be checked, I believe the default is that only a few criteria, like A7 and G11, are checked when you should notify the page creator no matter which speedy deletion criteria is relevant.

Thanks for all of your work! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:12, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

@Liz: Thanks. I spotted it because I tagged the mainspace page for speedy deletion months ago and it's now in my watchlist. Also, I think G8 specifically is one of the few criterias, alongside G6 and G7 with no notice/warning templates so I didn't believe I needed to, especially since "Notify page creator" is always turned on by default on my end. Correct me if I'm wrong. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 04:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

i Reyas614 (talk) 10:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

k —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 10:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)