Stop with your biased opinions, bowlout and super overs are used to decide points carried forward, official result is a tie. Check these links, they are in the article you keep editing falsely.

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=3;opposition=7;team=6;template=results;type=team http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283291.html

December 2012 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at India–Pakistan cricket rivalry. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS Talk 06:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply