User talk:TreasuryTag/Archives/2012/Dec

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TreasuryTag/Archives/2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Per previous.

Decline reason:

[1] Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

╟─TreasuryTag►contemnor─╢ 17:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

• As a community-imposed ban this will have to be discussed by the community. I for one am not even willing to open that conversation based on a two word unblock request. Unblock based on previous failed attempts to get unblocked? That makes no sense. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

  The points I made in my previous request (I'm happy to provide a link, or you can view it via the page history) are the same points I am making now. Much of the opposition last time was based on 'too soon' arguments. I have since been completely away from Wikipedia for over 6 months and trust that that opposition will not be repeated.
  I understand if you're not willing to start a discussion about this, therefore please could someone else do so on the well-known grounds that indefinite blocks are not supposed to be infinite, WP:OFFER etc.
  Thanks, ╟─TreasuryTag►stannator─╢ 18:01, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

  Whatever, you've at least supplied a few words of actual reasoning now so I have opened a discussion at WP:AN. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

  Appreciated. ╟─TreasuryTag►senator─╢ 18:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

  TT, if this unblock request is to be taken seriously I think you need to make a new, detailed statement, reflecting on the issues that led to your block/de facto ban and how you intend to prevent such issues from recurring. Otherwise I think this unblock request will be hastily declined. You might also have a word with Worm and seek his advice. N419BH 19:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

• The unblock request has clearly failed and I have closed the discussion. TT, you won't get unblocked while you continue to thumb your nose at community expectations. If you didn't already realise that "per previous" wasn't going to be helpful than you are not ready to come back... and if you did... well.. Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)