Welcome!

Hello Tobey~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Nlu 08:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Keith Harrison

edit

I have placed a tag on the article Keith Harrison, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person but it does not indicate how or why that person is notable. If you can indicate why Keith Harrison is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Keith Harrison. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. --Nlu 08:41, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages

edit

Hi Tobey. The convention on Wikipedia is for the most recent talk page discussions to go on the bottom of the talk page. Thanks. Rhobite 02:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Rhobite. Seemed logical that new discussions would be at the top, as that is how they are in most forums. --Tobey 06:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Digital-analog clock

edit

I've nominated Digital-analog clock, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Digital-analog clock satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital-analog clock and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Digital-analog clock during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

Nomination of Comparison of CECB units for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of CECB units is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of CECB units until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

03:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

19:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)