ThundermanLover1

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Wallykazam! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Wallykazam! was changed by ThundermanLover1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930148 on 2016-01-15T12:07:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Problematic edits

Another editor objected to the long-form, unsourced names at Wallykazam!. Restoring them as you did here without a proper justification isn't helpful. Please go to the talk page seek consensus for re-addition of this content, and please bring sources that support the long-form names. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

As CB says above, please visit Talk:Wallykazam!#Wallace and Douglas and Robert Trouble Goblin III and explain your edits. I've been pinging you but you haven't engaged in conversation like @TheLegoCat: has. I've reverted your edits again, you need to reliably source these names you keep adding. Also please stop vandalizing the page by removing Elizabeth Yeti and Wizard Jeff. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 17:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Dude I realize it might be hard to engage on a talk page while making mobile edits but I've requested you address your edits at Talk:Wallykazam!#Unsourced reversions and you appear to be ignoring the pings. I have asked you to do this on the History page under edit summary too. Are you actively ignoring this or just not noticing it somehow? 184.145.18.50 (talk) 12:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ThundermanLover1. You have new messages at Talk:Wallykazam!.
Message added 20:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Another editor has invited you to discuss your edits numerous times. If you choose not to respond, but keep making disputed edits, your editing privileges will be interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wallykazam. Please stop adding names. RotubirtnoC (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

^^^ what RC said. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)