Hello, Thomasfmoffatt. You have new messages at Shem1805's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Asflogocol.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Asflogocol.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Atlantic Salmon Federation edit

I've restored the article at Atlantic Salmon Federation - Dragonfly 6-7 deleted it because he was concerned it might be a copyright violation. We obviously take such things very seriously. I've tagged the article with some maintenance tags so our more experienced editors can tweak it a little bit and bring it in line with our 'style manual'. All Wikipedia articles are 'works in progress'! If you have any other questions please feel free to contact me. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I recently removed an obvious copyvio from the article; text was copied from here. User:DragonflySixtyseven may have been right after all. Other portions of the article may also be copyvios. While your reason for undeletion, "Not a copyvio from what I can tell, restoring while questioning user", seems reasonable, it doesn't seem like you've accurately checked the page for problems. Although completely unrelated, I'd like to wish you good luck on your ArbCom election. Guoguo12--Talk--  22:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I didn't count the mission statement, as they really have to be exact copies to accurately portray the mission! I thought of it as a 'direct quote'. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, but just remember that the text in question was not enclosed in quotation marks, nor was it attributed to a reliable independent source. I consider such quotes, especially such quotes used in a quasi-promotional tone, to be copyright violations. Of course, realistically, it's unlikely that anyone would notice it, but still ... “the search for perfection begins with detecting imperfection”. Guoguo12--Talk--  02:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Atlantic Salmon Federation, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Atlantic Salmon Federation constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Atlantic Salmon Federation. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Rich (MTCD)Talk Page 19:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

New message from Guoguo12 edit

 
Hello, Thomasfmoffatt. You have new messages at Guoguo12's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New messages edit

 
Hello, Thomasfmoffatt. You have new messages at Guoguo12's talk page.
Message added 21:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Guoguo12--Talk--  21:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Asflogocol.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Asflogocol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply