Thisrain

Hiya Thisrain, can you possibley alter your preferences so that you can receive emails, I wanted to email you some babbage :D --Razorlax (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

sent :-) --Razorlax (talk) 21:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Leeds/Leeds

Dear Thisrain. Re your comment: "...So perhaps it would make sense to move forward with this "very clear definition"? Or would that be too easy/involve the application of too much common sense? I feel we'll be waiting quite some time for those against a merger to disclose this wealth of information that's so obviously being withheld regarding definitions(!) Perhaps procrastination suits the status quo..?!" Maybe I'm being oversensitive here, but I feel you are ridiculing other people for merely holding an opposing opinion. Please may I ask you not to do this? Thank you. Yours sincerely, almost-instinct 22:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you :-) almost-instinct 22:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

No.. you're right Thisrain. Until common sense prevails Leeds will just be a misleading article --Tubsuk (talk) 20:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Leeds

There is currently a discussion regarding splitting of the Leeds article. As you were involved in the previous merge discussion you might be interested in this. Quantpole (talk) 21:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Miss Millie's Fried Chicken for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Millie's Fried Chicken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Millie's Fried Chicken until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rod ^talk 09:12, 5 December 2015 (UTC)