Your signature needs to be included when you're nominating an article for deletion. I've added it for you again, please don't remove it. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 15:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Flame Dragon 2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Flame Dragon 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fdplus title.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Fdplus title.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Flame Dragon 2

edit
 

The article Flame Dragon 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced, article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources (?)—it had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and there are no worthwhile redirect targets

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 23:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Flame Dragon Plus: Marks of Wind for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flame Dragon Plus: Marks of Wind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flame Dragon Plus: Marks of Wind until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply