July 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm DatGuy. Your recent edit to the page Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:34, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, you may be blocked from editing. DatGuyTalkContribs 22:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

But he has just joined Marseille. I saw it fron Fabrizio Romano Themadridista14 (talk) 22:47, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Romano also said Hakim Ziyech was joining Al-Nassr. You must wait until the deal is made official by the clubs. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ziyech is not going to Al Nassr. He failed medical examination Themadridista14 (talk) 20:05, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Which is just my point, you can't rely on journalist reports. You have to wait for official confirmation. DatGuyTalkContribs 00:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

But I heard it. HE FAILED MEDICAL TESTS. Search it on Google Themadridista14 (talk) 00:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Themadridista14! Your additions to Jordan Henderson have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham, you may be blocked from editing. Please understand that the stats in the infobox are for domestic league matches ONLY. This is the same for all player pages, not just this one. Struway2 (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

But why I don't understand. Champions League should count too meïté Themadridista14 (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Then start a discussion at the Footy project and not just add it over and over as this is disruptive. Kante4 (talk) 20:22, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Tbh, I'm not an expert so I don't know how to do it Themadridista14 (talk) 20:35, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jude Bellingham. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jude Bellingham. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Themadridista14 reported by User:Annh07 (Result: ). Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 11:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:26, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock}} ==

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Themadridista14 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

reason Please unblock me, I won't do it again

Decline reason:

You need to say what was wrong with your edits, and what you will do differently in the future. See WP:GAB. PhilKnight (talk) 19:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Themadridista14 (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

My fault edit

{{unblock|= I editted Jude Bellingham. He had scored 6 goals in 6 games but the arcticle said 5 apps and 5 goals. I can't understand why they count only league goals. It was my mistake, please next time count goals from all the competitions Themadridista14 (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply