July 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Rime movement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 23:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you'd like to be a little more civil with your edit summaries? Metagraph comment 23:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


I I am glad to see a 17 year old so active but his judgement is still not justified by any valid reasons and is the one being unconstructive. Thegone (talk) 23:37, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Which is what im refering to. You come off as sounding like a 17 year old can't judge what is appropriate or not. In future, it would be nicer to not refer to someones age as a level of intelligence. Metagraph comment 23:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I assume you are his friends. A whole section was deleted which referred to murders of many by a cult as well its bloody historic background with no reason or explanation. I will post my replies to you in your talk also so that you will see them. Thegone (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I helped you a bit at Rime movement and added one 'critical' sentence and some critical links at NKT. I can not do more to improve those articles. If I deleted facts accidental just restore them please. --87.185.217.102 (talk) 00:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, apart from Kelsang Gyatso almost all of the thousands of NKT are Europeans and Americans. The tales of so many ex-members is so horrendous. This western cult will explode in a catastrophic manner as the numbers of former members and their accounts is escalating beyond belief. Best wishes. Thegone (talk) 00:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring on various Tibet-related pages and pasting of copyrighted text from other websites into articles. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Sandstein  09:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is no copyright on the text by Dalai Lama on the murderous cult who has organized this on 'his' supposed copyright or more likely another new hater of the Dalai Lama (O-M) who I know! I am sorry to see you fooled thus by his enemies about his rights! I will take this to the admin forum as Wiki is under organized attack by the NKT cult and its many sockpoppets. This biased and one sided situation can not continue on these articles. Much of it is slander by a known abusive cult and is open to legal pursuit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Wisdombuddha Thegone (talk) 10:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your comment above indicates that you do not understand (or at any rate that you do not intend to comply with) Wikipedia policies and guidelines such as the copyright policy, the neutral point of view policy, the prohibition on disruptive editing, and others. Irrespective of the merits (if any) of your allegations against other editors, this and your contributions history indicates to me that you are a net detriment to our project dedicated to building a free, neutral, collaborative encyclopedia. For these reasons, I have blocked you indefinitely. I am open to lifting that block if you convince me that the aforementioned problems have been thoroughly remedied. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but please read WP:GAB first.  Sandstein  10:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

You will hear from me where it matters, in the admin forum. You will be monitored for future protection of an abusive cult too. These fascistic mentality and jackboot tactics always backfire. Thegone (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Having a good weekend 'meditation master'? Dolgyal allies are not allowed in Kagyu and should consider themselves expelled.

Sandstein, achtung! Not long now. Thegone (talk) 06:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD: Nominated for deletion edit

AfD nomination of Dorje Shugden edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dorje Shugden, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorje Shugden. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

AfD nomination of New Kadampa Tradition edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, New Kadampa Tradition, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Kadampa Tradition (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

File permission problem with File:7-line prayer to Guru Rinpoche.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:7-line prayer to Guru Rinpoche.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply