User talk:The Last Angry Man/sandbox

Latest comment: 12 years ago by The Last Angry Man in topic Editing history

Geolocation

edit

Marknutley is based in the UK; he has previously acknowledged this (e.g. [1]).

Editing history

edit
Nutleys blocks and socks are irrelevant as I have never edited from a proxie. Nor do I edit climate related articles as he and his sockpupets did
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

TLAM's editing career

edit
  • 28 April–15 May 2011: a series of open proxies and UK IP addresses (notably editing from Sky Broadband - 94.8.*.*, 94.12.*.*) made repeated disruptive edits to Communist terrorism, leading to the article being semi-protected on 15 May: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]
  • 17 May 2011: the 94.8.*.* IP editor began participating on Talk:Communist terrorism. Note that the IP editor was clearly familiar with Wikipedia terminology with the summary "i am not a blocked editor do an spi" in this edit.
    • Taking a single comment out of context is bad form, [11] Four editors mention SPI 11 times before I do.
  • 17 May 2011: User:The Last Angry Man was created. (Like User:Little Big Man, this is also a movie title [12].)
  • 19 May 2011: User:The Last Angry Man began posting to Talk:Communist terrorism, acknowledging that he was the previously-mentioned IP editor. [13] (TLAM later acknowledged his logged-out IP address here, also see here)
    • I registered an account after Paul Siebert (talk) 19:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC) told me I should. But the fact that I said I was the IP editor is somehow proof that I am socking?
  • 17 June 2011: User:The Last Angry Man was blocked as another Marknutley sockpuppet.
  • 8 September 2011: User:The Last Angry Man was unblocked after a successful Arbcom appeal. [14]
    • Yes an appeal which the arbitration committee cleared me of being a sock.

The dovetailing, non-overlapping nature of these edits and sockpuppet accounts should be noted:

In other words, as each previous account has been blocked, a new account has been created within a short period of time.

  • Another falsehood. Nutley was blocked from his computer, and his IP and his service provider three days after I created my account.

Previous discussions of TLAM and possible sockpuppetry

edit

Behavioural evidence

edit

Editing times

edit
Two people who live in the same country have similar editing times, shocker.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Note in particular the close match between the editing profiles (time/day of editing - predominately on Mondays, peaking at 18:00 GMT) of Marknutley (top) and The Last Angry Man (bottom):

 
 

Areas of interest

edit

Wikistalk indicates a high degree of correspondence between the edits of Marknutley, Tentontunic and The Last Angry Man. There is a greater degree of overlap between the edits of Tentontunic and The Last Angry Man, illustrating how The Last Angry Man has picked up where Tentontunic left off. The three accounts have all focused on a narrow range of articles related to "Communist terrorism", specifically:

They have also interacted with the same small core group of editors, notably User:Collect, User:The Four Deuces, User:Igny and User:Paul Siebert.

Disruptive behavour

edit

All three accounts display a similar pattern of disruptive behaviour on the same small range of articles that has led to the imposition of blocks and sanctions. Notably, all three have been sanctioned under WP:DIGWUREN:

The person behind these accounts has a persistent history of aggressive, tendentious and disruptive conduct, campaigning to promote a particular point of view and repeatedly causing friction with other editors. His repeated sanctions under the WP:DIGWUREN regime indicate that he has learned nothing and failed to moderate his behaviour on each occasion. After three such sanctions, it is reasonable to doubt whether he is capable of moderation.

Linguistic evidence

edit