TharmingamK

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, TharmingamK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Leadership by Virtue

Leadership by Virtue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Novel published in 2013 with a suspiciously complete summary. Doesn't appear to have been the subject of any reviews. [1] Nobody appears to have read it on Goodreads either. The tone is also overly promotional, which suggests WP:COI. Le petit fromage (talk) 14:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

• Weak Delete - I wasn't able to find sufficient sources to pass WP:NBOOK, but I'd like to see if anyone more familiar with Slovenian can find more? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 21:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
• Comment. This is one of the articles connected to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvin Aghayev and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khangrah, although the subject matter appears unrelated and no socks have appeared here yet. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete - all the cited reviews are blogs or worse, no coverage in reliable sources. This is quite likely the work of a paid editor or editors trying to scrape the lower range of notability criteria (and failing badly, IMO). — Yerpo ^Eh? 15:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree with Yerpo: this is written with the surface appearance of notability (having many sources on a varied selection of sites) but none of the sources looks reliable. And the scattershot nature of the topics related by the SPI makes me suspicious of paid editing. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Proposed deletion of Wheebox Employability Skill Test

The article Wheebox Employability Skill Test has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability issues

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Le petit fromage (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School Hundung

The article Sacred Heart Higher Secondary School Hundung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)