Welcome!

Hello, Terrance Lindall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Hurricane111 14:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:PORTRAITterry3.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:PORTRAITterry3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Pingretwiki.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Pingretwiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yukoisamu.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Yukoisamu.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kaaterskill Falls edit

Thanks for uploading the image. I changed the licensing to {{PD-old}}, since the picture is entirely a reproduction of the painting (meaning it would be a derivative work if copyright still applied), on which copyright has long since expired making it public domain (thus you can't attach GFDL to it as copyright would not otherwise apply). Daniel Case 02:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Qauakerwiki.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Qauakerwiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use Image:PORTRAITterry3.jpg edit

 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:PORTRAITterry3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

General points edit

Please make sure you post comments for other users on their talk page, and please sign such comments with four tildes <no wiki>David Underdown 15:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)</no wiki> (see WP:SIG). I have moved the remark you made on user:Philip Trueman to User talk:Philip Trueman to ensure that he sees it. David Underdown 15:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that, David.
Terrance (may I call you Terrance?), the issue is not whether what you have written is verifiable, but whether or not the article has been written or substantially modified by someone with a conflict of interest. Please read, and abide by, the relevant guideline WP:COI, especially WP:COI#Editors who may have a conflict of interest. I am sure the rationale behind that guideline is obvious - if people were completely free to modify articles about themselves, Wikipedia would lose credibility. WP:COI is not the only rule that applies; WP:BLP is also relevant - you would be justified in removing anything defamatory, for example.
There is nothing to prevent you from removing the tag yourself. But may I suggest that a good way to proceed would be for you to state briefly, on the article's discussion page, that in line with the guideline you will not make further edits to the article but will continue to monitor it and to participate as you see fit in the discussions on the talk page. If you do that, I'll be happy to remove the tag myself. Philip Trueman 15:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ballwiki4.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ballwiki4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image permission problem with Image:Ballwikilarge.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ballwikilarge.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image permission problem with Image:Ballwiki5.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Ballwiki5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ballwiki7.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ballwiki7.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Bellangewiki3.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bellangewiki3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGatalk 22:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Formalwiki.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Formalwiki.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:50, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Ballwiki3.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ballwiki3.jpg, which you've sourced to Joel Simpson. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Ballwiki3.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ballwiki3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Verifying copyright permission edit

Please do not restore the content published at Yuko Nii prior to following the posted directions for verifying license.

Your note at the talk page is not sufficient, I'm afraid. The website in question says "©1997–2013 Williamsburg Art & Historical Center"; if it is your website, you can modify it in accordance with the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials, and we will be able to clear the copyright concerns and evaluate the article against other content policies.

Wikipedia's purpose is not to reproduce what article subjects and closely connected sources say about themselves, but rather to summarize what reliable, uninvolved sources have to say. This is in keeping with our policies on neutrality and verifiability. We will need sources other than the organization she founded to verify her achievements - for instance, awards she was given can be verified by news reports or even press releases by the organizations that awarded them, but not by the Williamsburg Art & Historical Center . Please review WP:COI for more information. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, I will follow the wiki criteria. However, I would like to point out that anybody who writes an article does so because they have an interest. So there is something a little peculiar about "univolved." We got a scholar to write it, a good one who is reliable. I just do not know what to say.Terrance Lindall (talk) 15:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. The thread is Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Suite of COI articles. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:55, 10 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Terrance Lindall. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest noticeboard.
Message added 23:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)~. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Bellangewiki4.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Another one of your uploads, File:Bellangewiki2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Another one of your uploads, File:Bellangewiki5.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Another one of your uploads, File:Bellangewiki.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


Files missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:The Baron wiki.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Baron wiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Blue Erasmus front.jpg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Erasmus front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Terrance Lindall. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Hamtechperson 18:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Terrance Lindall. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bienvenido "Bones" Banez Jr..
Message added 17:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hamtechperson 17:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Terrance Lindall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Terrance Lindall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Manuscript of Speech by Queen Elizabeth I - warning on religion.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Manuscript of Speech by Queen Elizabeth I - warning on religion.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply