Tara Lemasters

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Collective Digital Studio has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Collective Digital Studio was changed by Tara Lemasters (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854398 on 2016-01-29T23:48:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tara Lemasters. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Studio 71, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. You are receiving this warning because you referred to Studio 71 as "our page" which is against WP:OWN and indicative of a conflict of interests. Your change has been reverted but I have softened it somewhat and tagged it as needing a reference. DanielRigal (talk) 22:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Studio 71, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Given your conflict of interests you should not be removing content from the article. DanielRigal (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interests Revisited

Ms Lemasters. I am going to let your removal of the unreferenced comment on Studio 71 stand because I was planning to remove it myself after trying, and failing, to find a source that could support it however you need to understand that you can not continue to use Wikipedia for the promotion or reputation management of your employer. If somebody later adds content critical of Studio 71 which is validly referenced you will have to let that stand. If you do not then you will quickly find yourself blocked from editing. The same goes if you add promotional content to articles. Please read the policy on conflicts of interests (linked in a previous message above) carefully. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2016 (UTC)