August 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Helen Clark. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bongwarrior 00:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Tangyfruitas.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Tangyfruitas.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blacksmith2 talkEditor Review 07:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply