Tancarville
![]() |
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
Articles for deletion nomination of Francis Sant-Cassia
editI have nominated Francis Sant-Cassia, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Sant-Cassia (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ravenswing 17:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
FYI to any admins ...
editI received an e-mail head's up (overlooked for a couple weeks, alas) from an admin who processed an unblock request from Tancarville on November 28th ... interestingly enough, the day before the most recent unblock request by his blocked sockpuppet User:Mobile Historian. He thought it odd that an unblock request after a year and a half would suddenly arise, came across this case and felt passing the word might be useful. Ravenswing 16:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
editHello Tancarville! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Mario de Marco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Antonio Cassar-Torreggiani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No valid sources proffered, and none turn up on a G-search, other than several Wiki mirrors and casual mentions. Article created by now-indef banned user and self-proclaimed genealogist who brought in considerable OR into many now-deleted articles, from his now-spamblocked websites.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 09:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)