User talk:TBloemink/Archive2

Huggle

Since Huggle is a very strong tool, its use is restricted on Wikipedia: only users with the rollback right may use it. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I was granted rollback rights yesterday, so I don't know why I can't use it - User:TBloemink/Signature 10:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

In that case I have no idea why it doesn't work; perhaps you have been given the right too recently? Try asking at the feedback page of Huggle, or via IRC (or perhaps on the talk page of Gurch, its original developer). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

It seems your version of Huggle is a bit outdated. You use 0.9.11, and I use the most updated one, which, at this point, is 2.1.3.  Hazard-SJ  ±  18:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi. First of all, I wanted to thank you for reverting vandalism - it's definitely appreciated. The other thing I wanted to mention is your signature. It appears you are transcluding a template as your signature. Please note that this is not allowed. If you have any questions about changing your signature to be more in line with the correct usage, just drop me a line. Thanks! TNXMan 16:39, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

The Streets

Join the fun, won't you? :-) --Soetermans | drop me a line | what I'd do now? 15:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

No title

I was only telling the truth....... Doesn't make me a bad person or does it on Wikipedia? please elaborate why you deleted this dear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eternal2jamie (talk • contribs) 15:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Take a look at this edit and this edit. Those edits won't fit in Wikipedia, that's the reason I reverted them. See Wikipedia:Vandalism. TBloemink _{service desk} 15:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

You reverted my edits to those the version containing ads from Google/copy and paste from Google.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aborigine, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 18:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for placing this warning. I immediately saw that it was wrong, and tried to undo it to the right revision. Unfortunately you already reverted it, and placed this warning. I know what I'm doing. TBloemink (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

My Recent RFA

Hello and thank you for your recent support in my last RFA. I have unfortunately had chosen to withdraw my RFA with a Support of 7 and Opposition of 26 and 0 Neutral. I am in good sprites to attempt a possible RFA in a later time with more experience. This seems one of the main concerns expressed by the Wikipedia community as well as fixing my grammatical errors.I hope you support me in my discussion to withdraw and I am looking forward to your support in a future RFA's and other edits made by myself here on Wikipedia.

Thanks Again,

Staffwaterboy ^{Critique Me} 00:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Regarding your revert.

As I did use facts which were mentioned in the news and delibrately spelt my swear word wrong in the style of a philsoper say Tao_Te_Ching for example, in order to not offend. However one must question why did you revert me. Thank you for you attention. Sun of Hypocrite's mum —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.21.104 (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that is possible, but the page was full of stuff which was in the news. You removed all content and replaced it with Some cun7s waved the egyaption flag a lot and got shot. This is marked as vandalism and was removed by a bot. Not by me - TBloemink (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Admin Tools Wiki

I confirm that I am TBloemink on the Admin Tools Wiki (wikia) - TBloemink (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

AfD

Hi TBloemink

As you commented on a previous AfD I thought you might be interested in this one.--Charles (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Question

Hallo,

Why did you revert in Stroosseschëld. Is there a very special reason? --Les Meloures 08:24, 30. Abr. 2011 (UTC) ^{(message originally posted to lb.wikipedia)}

I reverted it because the common form of the commonscat template is {{commonscat|Category on Commons}}. In this case it was changed to {{Commonscat|Category on commons|text to show}}. I prefer the first, which shows the category name, to prevent any misunderstandings (although, this chance is very small).

If you believe the change was done well, you may put it back, although I prefer the current state.

With kind regards, TBloemink (talk) 08:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Redirect request

Question for you: Did I inadvertently transpose the redirect for IRD? I know that substitute check already exists as an article. Should I have indicated IRD as the target instead of substitute check - pretty much in the way that I've redirected Image Replacement Document a few years ago (but not through this board) to substitute check? Wanted to know in case I made an error for the redirect. Many thanks for your help. →Lwalt ^♦ talk 08:57, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

I checked the page history of the redirect request page, and I rejected the request because the redirect you requested, IRD, already exists as a disambiguation page. As these pages are fine, I did not want to replace the content of the page, and that's why I rejected it. Please read WP:DISAMBIG for more information about disambiguation pages.

Also, if you requested Substitute check as redirect, it would have been rejected too because the article already exists.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to ask me, or on our live help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.

With best regards, TBloemink (talk) 09:17, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

AIV Report

Hi. I wanted to drop you a note about your report to AIV about 98.124.114.139. Please note that users/IPs are generally allowed to blank their talk pages (see WP:BLANKING). Edit warring over this is not permitted. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks. TNXMan 15:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

I am fully aware of this, but those weren't just messages like this message, those were warnings issued after vandalism. Warnings are not to be removed seconds after they are issued - TBloemink (talk) 15:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually, warnings can be removed, even if it is seconds after they are issued. BLANKING says "Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages" - there is no rule about how long warnings must stay up before they can be removed. TNXMan 15:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the head-up. If you can remove some personal attacks from his talk page and block his talk page, I'd be happy - TBloemink (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Already done. TNXMan 15:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy tag at Kolenchery Pally

Hi you speedy tagged Kolenchery Pally under G12. But the duplication detector report shows no matched phrases to the url you have mentioned. —  Abhishek  ^Talk 07:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I shouldn't have placed that tag, I googled ramdom phrases of text and like three of them created an exact hit, but maybe the text isn't under copyright (although, if it wasn't G12, it would have been A1 or something like that) Best regards, TBloemink (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok. It has been deleted under G7 now. Cheers! —  Abhishek  ^Talk 08:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I see Best regards, TBloemink (talk) 08:32, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Edward Guglielmino

Sorry again for reverting your good revert, wasn't paying enough attention. Formal retacion, Suggestion of copyvio was meant for someone else. TBloemink has not as my edit summary suggested violated copyright. duffbeerforme (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I see, I didn't even notice you undid my edit TBloemink (talk) 06:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked anyway

I went ahead and blocked User:Webseokrish as an obvious spam-only account (read the username: Web Search Engine Optimization). Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:35, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem - TBloemink (talk) 15:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Question (2)

i have been blocked ... tell me how can i create a sicial pages without you blocking me again41.234.54.29 (talk) 11:38, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

First of all, you are not blocked. Second, I do not understand your question, and third, I am not an admin so I cannot block you - TBloemink (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Question (3)

What is the limit # of times you can vandalize pages? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.154.121 (talk) 18:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Technically there is no limit. Until you are blocked - TBloemink _talk 18:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

That's possibly the most bizarre question I've ever seen asked here. danno 00:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)