Systematically99

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justice Forever for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 23:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Systematically99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dr. K. is deleting all the neutral cited info about the Cyprus issue. He is blocking everyone in favor of Turks or trying to persuade Wiki admins to block them. I will give examples. * PROOF 1: Deletion of Cited info in Northern Cyprus: Dr. K. is deleting all the neutral cited info about the Cyprus issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Cyprus&diff=523320322&oldid=522816205 The info:

National billiards teams of the Republic of Cyprus and TR of Northern Cyprus played each other for the first time in 2010.

.

Dr. K. TRNC and Cyprus matched and they played against each other. Why did you delete this?

• PROOF 2: Deletion of Cited info in Cyprus Dispute:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cyprus_dispute&diff=524104777&oldid=524103299 The info:

The Legal Aspects of Turkey's 1974 Action

• In order to justify the breach of Art. 2(4) UN Charter, the Turkey's government invoked Art. IV(2) Treaty of Guarantee ("In the event of a breach of the provisions of the present treaty, Greece, Turkey and the United Kingdom undertake to consult together with respect to the representations or measures necessary to ensure observance of those provisions. In so far as common or concerted action may not prove possible, each of the three guaranteeing Powers reserves the right to take action with the sole aim of re-establishing the state of affairs created by the present Treaty.").

• The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE): On 29 July 1974, PACE affirmed (via Resolution 573) that the Turkish military intervention was the exercise of a right emanating from an international Treaty and the fulfilment of a legal and moral obligation.
  

In 1983, PACE's resolution 974(1983) stated "The assembly, call once again for the immediate withdrawal of the Turkish troops which illegally occupy a part of Cypriot territory, this withdrawal being an indispensable condition for the final solution of the Cyprus crisis".

• United Nations (UN): Resolution 353(1974): "The security council demands an immediate end to foreign military intervention in the Republic of Cyprus that is in contravention of the provisions of paragraph 1 above Cyprus that is in contravention of the provisions".

• On 21 March 1979, Greece's Athens Court of Appeals decided that "The Turkish military intervention in Cyprus, which was carried out in accordance with the Zurich and London Accords, was legal. Turkey, as one of the Guarantor Powers, had the right lo fulfill her obligations. The real culprits . . . are the Greek officers who engineered and staged a coup and prepared the conditions for this intervention.”.

• Till now, there is no sanction applied on Turkey due to 1974 Cyprus war, some says this is another sign of legality dimension of 1974 events.

• There is no UN resolution that calls the Turkey's 1974 action as "invasion".

References

 Systematically99 (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Really obvious socking. Besides, I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocking users even deleted my defence!!: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Justice_Forever&diff=524108187&oldid=524106801