Swagsevo

Swagsevo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Swagsevo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Priyam Chatterjee

The article Priyam Chatterjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Many passing mentions, but no significant coverage as required by WP:GNG. Awards are unsourced and I'm unable to verify.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, there are many sources available if you google his name and if you follow his instagram you will see the picture of Ordre du Merite Agricole award given to him. Thank you. Swagsevo (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Hello Swagsevo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Swagsevo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Swagsevo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 06:10, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problems

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This was copy and pasted from elsewhere.[1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:48, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swagsevo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked because of "Disclosed paid editing and copyright problems". I understand that paid editing is not allowed and I cannot copy from another Wikipedia page which I did for only one instance. I will not make any paid editing and I will not write anything which can cause a copyright problem. Please, unblock me. Swagsevo (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your abuse of multiple accounts. For us to consider this request, you must list all articles for which you have been paid, all accounts where you have advertised paid editing services on external websites and all accounts you have used on Wikipedia. MER-C 19:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.