January 2009

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sathya Sai Baba, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sathya Sai Baba was changed by Sureshnaidu (u) (t) deleting 14937 characters on 2009-01-18T05:55:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sathya Sai Baba. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Question

edit
If you have questions about the Sathya Sai Baba article you can reach me at rad0909@yahoo.com. Radiantenergy (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Malaysian telugu

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Malaysian telugu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuffledThud (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Malaysian Telugus

edit

Hello, how are you doing. It seems that you are trying to impose your baseless racial and linguistics "pride" on Malaysian Indians. Refrain from doing so. Now lets we come to the article. Could your prove the racist claim your have made on the Malaysia Telugu page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malaysian IIndian (talkcontribs) 08:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malaysian Indian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Naidu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 06:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Reply