Steveha

your editing of the tour de france article

i just noticed that someone reverted your recent change of the tour de france article and they noted as the reason 'vandalism'. i don't think that is what you intended but i do have a guess as to why someone else might have misundertood your contribution. you did not mention second in importance to what other event. and, its just not a strong enough sentence; especially for the article intro. just my $0.02. uri budnik 08:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No one reverted any of my edits. The sentence deleted was added several edits down from my own edits. All I did was create an article explaining the General Classification, and then make those words link to the new article. I do not know what the deal was with that sentence; it was added anonymously, and I agree that it should not be in there. --Steveha 05:10, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

my bad. i was looking in the history where an anon person deleted that sentence and i incorrectly thought it was you. i just looked again and i guess i must have been confused. sorry. uri budnik 05:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No need to apologize. Thanks for taking the time to tell me about it! --Steveha 07:02, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Nomination of LavaRnd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LavaRnd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LavaRnd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)