StaticOasis

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinguetti Province has been accepted

Chinguetti Province, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the grading of the article and the valuable information! StaticOasis (talk) 18:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Franco-Moroccan War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

You have started all of this issue because of your refusal to admit what is clearly stated in the sources (that declare what is written in article 1 of the treaty) and the fact that the Ottoman Empire was alternatively called Turkey (and the direct link points this). Isn't reflecting and being truthful to the sources something that you have been advocating for? StaticOasis (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

You have a habit of cherry picking the sources that suit whatever you're after. The modern secondary RS would never mention such nonsense as Morocco having a border with Turkey. There are ways to improve the article when common sense is taken into consideration. M.Bitton (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Haven't your common sense yet make you realise the connection between Turkey and the Ottoman Empire in the sources? or maybe you ought to add information yourself instead of deleting everything that makes you allergic. StaticOasis (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

If you don't know the difference between the Ottoman empire, Turkey and the by then quasi independent Regency of Algiers, then there isn't a lot I can do to help you. As far as the article is concerned, I already added the relevant information (remember, the part of the treaty that is important is just the settling of the border between Algeria and Morocco, the rest is fluff. I suggest you spend more time adding content about what the article is really about: a war/battle). Your "allergic" remark has been duly noted. M.Bitton (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Maybe you should take that and help those who drafted the treaty. For all they cared the regency of algiers was a territory of the Ottoman Empire (for the third time repeating here, also called Turkey). StaticOasis (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sous expedition has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sous expedition. Thanks! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 00:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for you comment. I have addressed the concern and edited the draft accordingly. StaticOasis (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)