Squiresy92

October 2015

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chinese culture because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(talk) 17:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Re:Optimisation

 Done, I optimised the CoA, but it taken a lot of time since I removed all the <Flowroot> elements manually (since the text was exported to path and <Flowroot> causes ugly black blocks in most of viewers). As an advice, be sure to convert all the text to path before exporting.

For the optimisation, I use Scour (uses Python). If you're using a Linux distro, you can install from the repo. If you use Windows, you must install Python and install Scour with pip. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Conversion of copyrighted images to SVG

Are you aware of any recent discussions that now support conversion of non-free images to SVG format? It has been long held that such conversions are inappropriate as SVG files can be used to create high resolution copies of copyrighted works, thus violating WP:NFCC. Because this issue was confusing, I copied some information, including relevant links, to one of my pages. You can see it here. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Ensign of the Australian Defence Force.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ensign of the Australian Defence Force.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 07:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ensign of the Australian Defence Force.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ensign of the Australian Defence Force.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Flag gallery idea: 'State of North Queensland'

You had an interesting idea for a gallery of flag proposals on the 'State of North Queensland' article. That page should not expand much beyond its current size (it describes a political idea but much more material might make it look more popular than it is or seem like advocating it). Do you know of a graphic for the campaign flag used by Laurie Fabrellas, seen here:

• 'Editorial: Secession debate a healthy reminder' (Courier Mail)

Others may have come and gone over the years too. It is interesting in terms of theoretical vexillology.

Hogweard (talk) 06:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Unfortunately, I haven't seen a physical version of that flag either. I reckon that flag was probably custom-made as a one-off. I'd be interested to see if there was a picture online. Apart from that one and the Cattoni one, I remember seeing a proposal that used the Union Jack shaped into a pennant and placed on the hoist. The fly was blue, white and green (I think), but the site it was on no longer seems to be active. The Cattoni proposal is the only one I can see a consistent use in discussion of a North Queensland state.

I completely agree about the nicheness of the issue. I'm an Australian (not a Queenslander, though), and the issue seems to rise only occasionally, and usually due to a complaint about how state funds should be distributed. I've never seen the Queensland Government (beyond the occasional dissenting MP) ever seriously consider the idea. That might be why there are so few proposals, and how the Cattoni design easily got a high level of public exposure.

Squiresy92 (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC+10)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Squiresy92. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Squiresy92. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)