User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2018/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sikh Dharma: avoiding an edit war
Your recent editing history at Sikh Dharma shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Spiff,
In the past 24 hours, you have twice reverted attempted good-faith changes I have made to the Sikh Dharma page. Please note that another reversion at this time would violate the three-revert rule. I note also that your 2018-05-09 edit to that entry deleted 18,206 bytes of content without any attempt to abide by the editing policy to fix the problem.
I have started a discussion on the entry's talk page to discuss what appears to be a misunderstanding or disagreement about the proper entry for content about Sikh Dharma International, aka 3HO. I invite you to join me there for further discussion, rather than reverting my future edits without engagement.
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Five years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, SpacemanSpiff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Karna article
may need some protection again from IPs. @RegentsPark: please note in case Spiffy is away, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- I've extended protected it. Permanently. --regentspark (comment) 16:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)