Sophiesorbonne
- You're welcome! And speaking of welcome, here's a welcome message to help you get started as a new Wikipedian:
Welcome!
Hello, Sophiesorbonne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --AbsolutDan (talk) 17:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
reasons for revert in Satyabrata Rai Chaowdhuri edit
Can you give me any reason for stating that this perosn is one of the most prominent schoalrs in South Asian studies today? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rimibchatterjee (talk • contribs) 08:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Kindly meet the renowned scholars of South Asian Studies at home and abroad and ask for their opinion about Rai Chowdhuri. Then if you have any further questions please come with that. I will be happy to face your question.
Sincere regards
Sophie, France. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sophiesorbonne (talk • contribs) 08:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Removing comments on article discussion page edit
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Talk:Satyabrata Rai Chowdhuri. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --AbsolutDan (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I do understand. But the discussion was regarding reviews which do not exist anymore. So is there any justification for this comment to be here at all?Sophiesorbonne 05:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, even if the work has been completed, the comment should remain "on the record". The only time that information should be removed from a talk page is if it is archived, is a personal attack, or if it is completely off-topic. --AbsolutDan (talk) 12:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Professor Rai Chaudhuri edit
I am sorry if you were offended about my comment. My intention was not at all to cast aspersions on Professor Rai Chaudhuri's scholarship nor his standing; I simply felt that the article did not do him justice and was phrased in too vague and unsupported a manner to give a real sense of his achievements. I am well aware of his standing and was concerned that those outside India who do not know his name would not come away with an accurate idea of his contributions. My efforts to clean up the phrasing had that objective. The present article is fine although the addition of a select bibliography would be nice. The previous one duplicated a lot of stuff that had been syndicated around the world, and it was hard to find things in it. best regards --- Rimi 15:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Sophiesorbonne, if you have some time and resources, how about adding a section to Satyabrata Rai Chaudhuri's page regarding his major theories, findings and books? Thanks
The Psychology Wiki edit
Hi Sophiesorbonne! This is Jaywin from The Psychology Wiki. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at the Psychology Wiki. If you'd like, check out our mission statement. If this project looks interesting to you, feel free to set up a user page. We'd certainly appreciate any contributions that you would be willing to make. Have a good one! EPM 22:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Sir Satyabrata.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Sir Satyabrata.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Rai Chowdhuri.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Rai Chowdhuri.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, are you in Oxford still? edit
Notice you have userbox Oxonian. Could you go to the Ashmolean and take a photo of the Domitianus coin, to replace Image:Domitianus coin.jpg, which may soon be deleted for not being fair use. Thanks! Neddyseagoon - talk 13:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Tapan Ray Chaudhuri edit
Greetings. I noticed that the most common spellings on the web are either "Raychaudhari" or "Raychaudhuri", and "Ray Chaudhuri" is found only once. I suspect Raychaudhuri is correct. Could you confirm and change the article accordingly? Thanks.Amberhabib 06:04, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
A new Oxbridge user box edit
Sophiesorbonne...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:08, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Nomination of Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 04:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Emeritus Professors in India has been nominated for merging edit
Category:Emeritus Professors in India has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)