January 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sarath Fonseka, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chamal talk stealth mode 13:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC) Why don't you allow to publish Sarath Fonseka's untold currupt and illegal as well as harmful activities that he intentionally carried out while he was in his office so let them to appear in this page otehrwise the account that has been published in wikipedia is partial. I don't agree with that priciple that you stick to.Reply

Certain inforamtion which the writer has presented in respect of Sarath Fonseka is totally partial and accurate details about him has not been emphasized. Because of this reason, it seems that this web page has been constucted with the sole objective of presenting the personal image of Sarath Fonseka as a saint as well as a real hero to teh readers. But this is entirely distortion of facts so that readers are requested to refer to other sources to know more about Sarath Fonseka's real character which the Wikipedia writer has hidden.

See WP:SOAPBOX. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to User talk:Songkla123. Thank you. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 01:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply