User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2014/August
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
EID MUBARAK
Eid Mubarak to you and your family,
I am really very grateful for your help in my signature,
Regards
Aftab Banoori (Talk) 17:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thankyou and belated Eid Mubarak to you also, and you are welcome. -- SMS Talk 17:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Shehzad Roy's page
I am unclear as to why you have deleted the portions I had added to the Shehzad Roy page. All my edits were well cited from reliable newspapers like DAWN, Tribune etc. I want to avoid an edit war so I would appreciate it if we could discuss your concerns here. I would be happy to incorporate your feedback into my future edits.Thanks!PKRedits (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Your edit on the Cheema article
I inserted a delete tag on the Cheema article, as over 90% of the content had been removed after further investigation I have found that article's editors some of them had previously used sockpuppets and have been banned for their persistent abuse of wiki policy. Me and another user had established a consensus that rather than deleting the entire article page we should revert it back to the most reasonable one, you have seemed to reverted it back without informing either of us or even discussing the issue back the the problematic article which over the years had over 90% of reasonably well cited content removed over a sustained period. I feel the best way to resolve this is to start an arbitration, and to investigate users who have removed cited content and on what basis. Or the entire article to be deleted as it serves no real purpose if it only has 1 line of uncited text. What is your position would you like keep editing article or leave it as RastogiProf last edit, or I can go ahead and start an arbitration request to establish what is exactly going on, and on what basis has Sitiush over the years deleted cited content, without even attempting to improve the article, a sockpuppetry check would also be a good idea. Your support on the matter will be greatly appreciated. Syanaee (talk) 11:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- disregard, I see the user has already been blocked, I think a further investigation is need on Sitush and arbitration on the article. Syanaee (talk) 11:11, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)