Skv28
Welcome
editWelcome!
Hello, Skv28, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Filing Flunky (talk) 11:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi Skv28. Thanks for the edits. I've cleaned the article up a bit more, removing more unreferenced and dubious claims. It's still not clear that the website is notable, as I don't think any of the sources provides qualify as "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" as required by WP:GNG. If you can find some articles (in other news sources) writing about WN.com, that would be very useful. Pburka (talk) 02:19, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Skv28. Regarding the links you found:
- http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=site%3Awn.com&btnG=Google+Search - this is just a Google search. I assume you're suggesting using it as a reference for how many pages Google scanned? In that case, I would suggest that it's WP:original research. I also question how valuable that statistic is. What point are we trying to make with the statistic?
- http://library.laguardia.edu/webguide/news - this is just a "passing reference". It doesn't provide any in-depth coverage about the subject.
- http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2066117/A-Different-Look-at-World-News - this one is more in depth. I'm not familiar with the source, but it looks like it's reasonably well respected, so it should probably count as a WP:reliable source.
- Pburka (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Skv28. Regarding the mobile links. What you've found is primary source evidence that the service exists (that is, they were both published by the subject of the article). Primary sources can be used with great caution, but it's much preferable to find secondary sources. When I consider the information the sources support, I ask myself how valuable the information is. In this case, it seems more like advertising than something which an encyclopedia ought to cover. If you want to include information about the mobile version it would be much better to find a review of the mobile app in an independent reliable source. For example, if the New York Times Bits Blog reviewed it, that would be a very good source and we could include a WP:NPOV overview of the site based on its praise and criticism. Pburka (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Skv28, I see that you made an article for World News (WN) Network, which I've edited to include 3 tags. Please bring any of your concerns to the discussion page of the article, so that everything can be consolidated. Sans Nom Reeves (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Skv28. When you click on Adriano Zumbo, you end up at Zumbo (TV series), but if you look closely, under the title, it says: (Redirected from Adriano Zumbo). If you click on that link, you'll end up at the redirect page itself and you can just edit it. Let me know if you have any more questions. Pburka (talk) 12:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
File:World News WN Logo.png missing description details
edit
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)Nomination of World News (WN) Network for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World News (WN) Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World News (WN) Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wctaiwan (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)