SillyHoe

Christina Aguilera discography

The edits you are making are unconstructive. let's discuss them first, please. First of all, if a song is sent to iTunes, then it is considered a de facto single, regardless of its radio promotion. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 22:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

To be honest, i think it is not correct to include Beautiful and The Prayer under the category "Lead Singles" because they are not official singles and obviously they are not lead singles by Christina Aguilera. "Beautiful" (with Beverly McClellan) is one of the various versions of Christina's official single "Beautiful". It should not be listed among Christina's singles. It doesn't matter if it was released on iTunes, all The Voice performances are released on iTunes. It's a cover version of "Beautiful", not a new song. It's my opinion of courseChronisgr (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I agree with you on "Beautiful". Although I was just explaining how singles work. Specific matters should be discussed on the talk page of the discography first, I guess. Removing content once is acceptable, but if other user reverts, the best way to go is to discuss it on the talk page before starting an edit war which may cause someone to end up blocked—which is undesirable. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 22:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

So what are you suggesting? Should we remove the song from the list of Christina's singles?Chronisgr (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, SillyHoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Bold, Revert, Discuss

Hi SillyHoe. We have a system here for when there is a dispute and it starts with bold edits, reversion and discussion. It moves on other dispute resolution methods. However, it does not involve reverting ad nauseam. If you carry on trying to force your edits into the articles against consensus, you will end up blocked - so why not try discussing your edits on the talk page? Worm^TT(talk) 14:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

This individual is becoming a problem and is quite annoying. Does not understand the mistakes in their edits and after viewing this talk page it's clear this is not the first time SillyHoe has had this problem. She has continued to make reverts so it would be best to block this individual since they cannot understand. DeadSend4 (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gwen Stefani discography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Christina Aguilera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Hello, I'm Dan56. Your recent edit to the page Lotus (Christina Aguilera album) appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Christina Aguilera. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Statυs (talk) 11:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Christina Aguilera discography, you may be blocked from editing. Statυs (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by falsifying sources and introducing incorrect information, as you did here at Bionic (Christina Aguilera album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 21:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)